Critical technologies supply chains
Adobe Image
In this paper, Raji Rajagoplan talks about why the Quad must have a common approach to the security of critical technology supply chains and the need to avoid excessive dependence on a single manufacturing source, such as China.
Key points
- Excessive dependence on a single manufacturing source, such as China, has exposed the vulnerabilities of many countries over the last few years, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Though there have been plenty of discussions within the Quad about the need for a common approach to the security of critical technology supply chains, most action has been undertaken unilaterally, or by a couple of countries.
- Stronger technological cooperation between Quad countries will not pan out organically, so politically-conscious decisions are necessary – especially from India due to its history and structural factors.
Policy recommendations
Quad countries should:
- Act more jointly to secure supply chains for critical technologies, as actions taken by larger groups of countries will be more effective.
- Discuss ways to mitigate the negative collateral consequences of measures such as sanctions and tougher export controls imposed by the US and its partners, as well as by China.
- Focus on building skills, within the Quad and like-minded partners, in areas such as semiconductors.
- Move aggressively towards standard-setting in telecom networks to ensure openness, diversity and security.
About the series
This paper has been written for the Quad Tech Network Dialogue, as part of the Quad Tech Network (QTN) initiative. QTN is an initiative of the NSC, delivered with support from the Australian Government. It aims to establish and deepen academic and official networks linking the Quad nations – Australia, India, Japan, and the United States – in relation to the most pressing technology issues affecting the future security and prosperity of the Indo-Pacific.
